{ controversial magazine cover } Today's outrage: Obama on the cover of the New Yorker
Graphic storytelling and visual narrative
Fist bumpin': Barry Blitt [cartoonist] (21-
This cartoon has ignited a storm of indignation and a put-down from the Obama campaign. Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton said, "The New Yorker may think, as one of their staff explained to us, that their cover is a satirical lampoon of the caricature Senator Obama's right-wing critics have tried to create. But most readers will see it as tasteless and offensive. And we agree."
I disagree. I think the cartoon is exactly the kind of full-bodied satire the public needs to see published in the national press – in general and specifically in reaction to right-wing polemics (which cry out for mainstream, push-backing parody).
The alternative press has always published cartoons this biting – as its mission and bread and butter, but that's not the case with the timorous mainstream press. And so, criticism of the New Yorker is not surprising. But as far as I can see, critics of the New Yorker and of the cartoon should remember how to take a joke.
Did I mention I'm a New Yorker subscriber? Bravo to the New Yorker.




I am so glad you agree. So many folks at work this week were talking about how outraged they were about it (most of them hadn't even seen the cover) - and I thought it was great. I felt like I had to keep my mouth shut - or else it was like I was condoning such a 'thing'.
And I subscribe to the New Yorker too.
Reply to this
Just left a comment, but it didn't...do whatever it is supposed to do. Hmmm.
Okay, more briefly: I totally agree. I loved the cover - and felt as if I needed to get that fact quiet at work, or else folks what say that I was condoning sterotypes. I think that's bullshit. And yeah - I subscribe too.
Reply to this
Yeah, I can't explain the histronics. I mean, the cartoon's "racist"?!? No.
Reply to this