Robert Christgau's Consumer Guide now at MSN

Robert Christgau (born 1942) Criticism (updated and bumped up from 30-Apr-07)
Making good on the Voice's loss: Robert Christgau, Consumer Guide [monthly compendium of capsule record reviews written by Christgau since 1969], MSN Music [Microsoft Network portal], online at music.msn.com/music/consumerguide (accessed 30-Apr-07).


Same Consumer Guide as it ever was. Don't be put off by the off-putting institutional site design.


UPDATE, Sunday, November 18, 2007: See Jody Rosen for insight into Christgau's strategy, technique and props in writing the short review (X-ed out: The Village Voice fires a famous music critic, 05-Sep-06, Slate, online at slate.com). (Highlighting below mine.)

Christgau's project at the Voice was to create a venue for popular-music writing that assumed a certain readership – one equipped not just with broad cultural knowledge but with a fluency in music history, the pop canon, and all the little meta-narratives of individual artists and their discographies. The goal, in other words, was to talk about pop music in the way literary critics talked about books. Christgau succeeded in making the Voice the indispensable source for serious music writing – in the '70s and '80s, it was a local alternative weekly read by music nuts from coast to coast. The critical ideal of serious music writing was best exemplified in his own pieces, packed tight with erudition and insight.

Isn't that the truth. The Voice in the 70s and 80s published the best music writing available anywhere, every week. The best, most knowing and irreverent writing about rock. The best, most authoritative writing about jazz. The best, most righteous writing about R&B. And the best, most informed writing about all of the permutations that new, creative music took during that period. All thanks to Christgau's editorial direction. Surprisingly (to me, anyway), during that period, Christgau edited jazz writer Gary Giddens, whose astounding ability to describe music in words turns out to owe a debt to Christgau – As does anyone who ever thought that dancing this mess around was enough only half the time
.


UPDATE, Saturday, July 19, 2008: Denver's alternative weekly Westwood published an interview with Ahmir "?uestlove" Thompson a while back (Q&A with Ahmir ?uestlove Thompson of the Roots by Michael Roberts [28-May-08], Westwood blogs), but the interview is new to me. It's got substance. ?uestlove riffs about hip-hop's status and its opportunities wasted and found; Erykah Badu's audience-defying new album; the inevitable tension between the Roots and whoever their label is; the decline of the record industry; and ?uestlove's own work at resuscitating the careers of soul icons Al Green and Tom Jones (huh?). Along the way, ?uestlove comments on music journalism and offers kudos to Christgau:

I think Robert Christgau is the last record reviewer on earth who listens to eight records a day twice before giving his opinion on it... Christgau is the last true-blue record critic on earth. He gave us an A-plus [for the Roots' latest album, Rising Down]. That's pretty much who I make my records for. He's like the last of that whole Lester Bangs generation of record reviewers, and I still heed his words. He gets my vision, and I'm cool with that. But half these people, they read Pitchfork, and they base half their opinion and quotes on that.

If Greg Tate had written up the interview, he would have transmogrified ?uestlove's magnanimous dialogue, immortalizing it in one electric, magnificent essay, which is how Christgau's Voice reported on music back in the day.

Although, I'm not sure if Tate would have pointed out that ?uestlove didn't need to slam all contemporary music critics. Sasha Frere-Jones is one currently active critic whose music writing picks up from where Christgau, Tate, Bangs, Greil Marcus, Ellen Willis, et al. leave off. Seek out Frere-Jones. (In addition to everything else, he's got good things to say about the Roots.)


Greg Tate (born 1957)UPDATE, Thursday, August 21, 2008: What's that? You don't know Greg Tate? Man, he wrote about music for the Voice in the 80s. And here's how he describes it (License to ill: Black journalism in the pages of the 'Voice', 18-Oct-05, online at villagevoice.com):

The nature of the Voice easily made that radical pipe dream of a career plan a reality. I can't think of anywhere else my impudent ass would have been able to do the history of Harlem one week, George Clinton and hermeneutics the next, or routinely be encouraged to dispense my arcane opinions on Bootsy Collins, King Sunny Ade, Cecil Taylor, and the Bad Brains, or be given major space to theorize on the trial of eight Black revolutionaries whose sympathies lay with members of the Black Liberation Army and the Weather Underground.

This doesn't even begin to talk about the utterly outrageous liberties I got to take with the English language high and low here because, as was explained to me – by that amazing staff of editors who midwifed and made the paper sing in the '80s: Christgau, M. Mark, Kit Rachlis, Vince Aletti, Ross Wetzsteon, et. al – the Voice was a writer's paper, where editors were encouraged to help you say what you wanted to say in the way you wanted to say it and stay vaguely consistent with the style manual.

Greg "Ironman" Tate – See this essay by Michael Gonzales for a first-hand report on the repercussions of Tate's writing (and how Christgau helped set it in motion): A love from outer space: Why Greg Tate matters (25-Oct-07, online at blackadelicpop.blogspot.com).

Music writing in the Voice in the 70s and 80s: What the Velvet Underground did for those who heard them live in the 60s, the Voice did for readers who – during the 70s and 80s – ate up each week's issue.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.